Article provided by: Your Case Worth, All Rights Reserved.
The onset of spring is when most homeowners and farmers begin to take a closer look at their backyards and plantation grounds. You are probably thinking about how you can maintain a healthy growth of flowers and plants with the least work of constant weed eradication. The first solution is to use one of the most common weed-killing solutions in the local store.
One such product is the Monsanto roundup weed killer. You may not question its safety, or you may have an idea of all the implications surrounding its use. The answer to whether you should use the product is straightforward and yet complicated.
History of Roundup
The weed-killing product was already a popular weed killing solution in 2001. The firm Monsanto was generating between 85 to 90 million from its sale. The revenue rose to 185 million pounds in the next six years.
Before 2007, Monsanto had a specialization in selling modified crops. The modification was a setup to allow the plants to have a tolerable quality to glyphosate. This particular ingredient was common in pesticides. Availability of GMO allowed farmers to spray the Monsanto Roundup weed killer on cotton, corn, soybeans an all other modified crops.
Monsanto rose in the ranks because it had revolutionized the farming industry with the development of two collaborative products. Framers bought into the movement’s promise and religiously bought the two divine farming duos. The truth of the matter would become a reality in the millennial age.
One case involving Monsanto’s unfortunate predicaments was a court order to pay $289 million to a groundskeeper. The candidate's case proved valid in accusing the solution as a causative agent of cancer. The judge of this particular case stated that Monsanto withheld critical information regarding the potential dangers of Roundup weed killer.
In 2019, an Oakland, California jury issued a ruling to pay $2 billion worth of covers on damages after investigating the claims of an elderly farming couple. The 76-year-old Alva and 74-year-old Albert sued Monsanto for claims that Roundup was the culprit in their cancer diagnoses. They will receive an additional $55 million to cater to their medical expenses and ease the mental and emotional suffering.
The jury deliberated the case for only two days before voting in favor of the farmers. They had strong convictions that Roundup was a critical contributor to the growth of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
The rising cases against Monsanto have sparked outrage and fear in people across the world. Communities formed protests against GMOs and glyphosate came under severe scrutiny. The World Health Organization has a report on its assessment of the chemical.
YourCaseWorth.com is an informational and legal website that keeps up with fiery news regarding critical aspects of similar court allegations. We offer information to help fight your claims and get the right damages' coverage. Presently, several regions in some states of the United States have limits on products that contain the dangerous glyphosate chemical. Some of them include the following:
- New Jersey
- New Hampshire
- New York
- North Carolina
- Arizona California
Monsanto Roundup Weed Killer